Yajurveda – chapter- 32: ~ God is the Supreme Spirit, has no ‘Pratima’ (idol) or material shape. He cannot be seen directly by anyone. He pervades all beings and all directions. Thus, Idolatry does not find any support from the Vedas.
Even the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad: ~ Brahman (God in truth) is the form of the Athma, and it is indeed Athma itself.
Even Rig Veda: ~ The Atman is the cause; Atman is the support of all that exists in this universe. May ye never turn away from the Atman, the Self. May ye never accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman?" (10:48, 5)
Whatever is real in the world in which we exist is God. All that is real in the world in which we exist is the Soul, the Self.
Thus, by realizing the Self, which is the Soul, we discover the invisible Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness itself, is God, which is hidden by the ‘I’, which is the dualistic illusion or Maya.
Even Bhagavad Gita says: ~ Brahmano hi pratisthaham ~ Brahman (God in truth) is considered the all-pervading consciousness, which is the basis of all the animate and inanimate entities and material. (14.27).
When Bhagavad Gita says, God is considered the all-pervading consciousness which is the basis of all the animate and inanimate entities and material then nothing has to be accepted as God other than consciousness.
Status of God: ~
There is no place for a personal God (Ishvara) in Advaitic Reality. Mixing the concept of God becomes a great hindrance in the pursuit of truth. The universe is, in an ultimate sense, described as "false" because consciousness appears as the waking experience due to ignorance.
The waking experience is a reality from the standpoint of the waking entity. And the waking experience is a falsehood from the standpoint of the invisible Soul, the ’Self’. Just as the waking experience is false, the man and his experiences, which are present within the waking experience, are also false.
The experience of birth, life, and death, which happens within the world, is also false. The form, time, and space within the waking experience are also false.
Karma and Bhakti have nothing to do with the ultimate truth or Brahman. People who talk about a personal God, Karma, are not fit for Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana.
Brahman (God) ~ the One without a Second: ~
The Atman is Self-evident. It is not established by extraneous proofs. It is not possible to deny the Atman because it is the very essence of the one who denies it. The Atman is the basis of all kinds of knowledge, presuppositions, and proofs.
The invisible Soul, the Self is within, the Self is without; the Self is before, the Self is behind; the Self is on the right, the Self is on the left; the Self is above, and the Self is below. Brahman is not an object, as it is Adrisya, beyond the reach of the eyes. Hence, the Upanishads: “Neti Neti—not this, not this....” This does not mean that Brahman is a negative concept, or a metaphysical abstraction, or a nonentity, or a void. It is not another. It is all-full, infinite, changeless, ‘Self’-existent, ‘Self’-delight, Self-knowledge, and ‘Self’-bliss. It is Svarupa, essence. It is the essence of the witness. It is the Seer (Drashta), Transcendent (Turiya), and Silent Witness (Sakshi).
Sage Sankara’s Supreme Brahman is impersonal, Nirguna (without Gunas or attributes), Nirakara (formless), Nirvisesha (without special characteristics), immutable, eternal, and Akarta (non-agent). It is above all needs and desires. It is always the Witnessing Subject. It can never become an object as it is beyond the reach of the senses. Brahman is non-dual, one without a second. It has no other besides it. It is destitute of difference, either external or internal. Brahman cannot be described because description implies a distinction. Brahman cannot be distinguished from any other than itself. In Brahman, there is no distinction between substance and attribute. Sat-Chit-Ananda constitutes the very essence or Svarupa of Brahman and not just its attributes. The Nirguna Brahman of Sage Sankara is impersonal.
Sage Sankara gave out what was of most use to the greatest number of people. Therefore, in the commentaries on the Upanishads, such as the famous Mundaka, he gave the highest non-dual message of the identity of Atman and Brahman, revitalizing the philosophy and practice of Advaita, while in the commentaries on the Brahmasūtra he gave lesser teaching, positing both higher and lower Maya and higher and lower Brahman (Ishvara) to explain creation for those of lesser intellects until they were ready for the highest truth.
Sage Sankara was very careful with his choice of semantic analysis and use of words - taught at different levels of doctrine at different times as the situation warranted.
Sage Sankara first came to the attention of Sage Gaudapada when his own guru brought him to the Himalayas to present his Advaita writings of the great Sage, who encouraged his further endeavors.
The Advaitic formula, to be successively realized, is: “The world is unreal; Brahman is real; the world is Brahman.” This is the vision of non-duality. Sage Sankara affirmed a progression of points of view depending on the stage of one’s practice.
Sage Sankara says:~ Whatever thing remains eternal is true, and whatever is non-eternal is untrue. Since the world is created and destroyed, it is not true.
The Truth is the unchanging thing. Since the world is changing, it is not true.
Whatever is independent of space and time is true, and whatever has space and time in itself is untrue.
Just as one sees Dreams in sleep, he sees a kind of super-dream when he is waking. The world is compared to this conscious dream.
The world is believed to be a superimposition of the Brahman. Superimposition cannot be true.
On the other hand, Sage Sankara claims that the world is not absolutely false. It appears false only when compared to Brahman. In the pragmatic state, the world is completely true, which occurs as long as we are under the influence of Maya. The world cannot be both true and false at the same time; hence, Sage Sankara has classified the world as indescribable. The following points suggest that, according to Sage Sankara, the world is not false ( Sage Sankara himself gave most of the arguments).
The whole wisdom of Sage Sankara can be summed up in the following statement:-
Brahma satyam, jaganmithya, jivobrahmaivanaparah: ~Brahman alone is real; the world is non-real and the individual Self (ego) is essentially not different from Brahman.
This is the quintessence of Sage Sankara’s wisdom.
Sage Sankara gave out what was of most use to the greatest number of people. Therefore, in the commentaries on the Upanishads, such as the famous Manduka Upanishad, he gave the highest nondual message of the identity of Atman and Brahman, revitalizing the philosophy and practice of Advaita, while in the commentaries on the Brahmasūtra he gave lesser teaching, positing both higher and lower Maya and higher and lower Brahman (Ishvara) to explain creation for those of lesser intellects until they were ready for the highest truth
The misinterpretation is because of Bhagavan Buddha himself. Most of the questions were answered only by silence, leaving many to interpret as per their understanding. The enlightenment of Bhagavan Buddha and which again was indirectly accepted by Sage Goudpada. : ~ Santthosh Kumaar



