Monday, 29 September 2025

The word Hindu was used initially to describe the people of India; it was never used to describe religion.+

Dharma is a very complex word. The concept of dharma is verily the core of our religion. In fact, the right name for our religion is  Santana Dharma, which means 'Eternal Dharma'.

The word 'Hinduism' has become a common word in the modern world. The real fact is that words like Hinduism, Hindu etc. never appear in any of the ancient scriptures! So to know our religion, the first step is to know what dharma means. 

The word Hindu was used initially to describe the people of India; it was never used to describe religion. Thus, Hinduism is not a religion; it is the way of life of Indian people with different caste, creed, culture, tradition, and ideology of different parts of India under a single roof.

Hinduism is not a Vedic religion or Sanatana Dharma.

Origin of the word 'Hindu:~

The word Hindu is derived from the Indo-Aryan and Sanskrit word Sindhu, which means "a large body of water", covering "river, ocean". ... The term 'Hindu' in these ancient records is ethno-geographical and did not refer to a religion. The Arabic equivalent Al-Hind likewise referred to the country of India.

Many scholars and historians have concluded that the word 'Hindu' was coined by the ancient invaders who could not accurately pronounce the name of the River Sindhu. According to Sir Monier Williams, the famous Sanskrit lexicographer, the words 'Hindu' and 'India' evidently do not possess...

Interestingly, the word "Hinducame into existence because of the mispronunciation of a Sanskrit word by the ancient Persians some 3000 to 4000 years ago. The word "Hindu" is not a Sanskrit word. It is not found in any of the thousands of native dialects and languages of India. Neither is it a religious word. It is a secular word...

Hindu means nothing. Hindu and word Hinduism was given by Irani and Persian people who can’t pronoun Sandhu, so they call people opposite side of river Sandhu as HINDU & Hinduism was given by Britishers. In Reality, Hinduism means Sanatana Dharma. People of Hinduism follow Satvik behaviour. Follow 4 Vedas...

The word 'Hinduhas no meaning, actually. Hindu is derived from the word Sindhu in Sanskrit, the historical local name for the Indus River. The word 'Hindu' occurred first as a Persian geographical term for the people who lived beyond the river Indus. Hindu was a geographical term and did not refer to a religion. 

People on the Indian side of the Sindhu were called Hindu by the Persians and the later Western invaders. That is the genesis of the word `Hindu'.

When we think of the Hindu religion, we find it difficult, if not impossible, to define the Hindu religion or even adequately describe it. Unlike other religions in the world, the Hindu religion does not claim anyone prophet; it does not worship anyone God; it does not subscribe to any one dogma; it does not believe in any one philosophic concept; it does not follow anyone set of religious rites or performances; in fact, it does not appear to satisfy the narrow traditional features of any religion or creed. It may broadly be described as a way of life and nothing more.

Hinduism seems to be a name without any content. Is it a museum of beliefs, a medley of rites, or a mere map, a geographical expression?

The Vedas, as a body of scripture, contain many contradictions, and they are fragmentary in nature. For most Hindus of today, scriptures like the Bhagavad-Gita, Ramayana, Mahabharata, and Puranas are more attractive and appealing than the Vedas.

The Gods and Goddesses they worship differ considerably from the Vedic ones. The collection of hymns called the Vedas,which  are written in praise of certain deities by poets over several centuries, does not seem to have much significance for the Hindus of today.

Hinduism is ‘Puranic based on mythology. Hinduism is based on the myth because it believes in mythological Gods. Vedic Gods like Indra, Varuna, Agni, Soma, and the like, whom the Vedic people worshipped, hardly have any significance in present-day Hinduism.

Rig Veda 1/164/46: ~ “They call him Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Agni, or the heavenly sunbird Garutmat. The seers call in many ways that which is One; they speak of Agni, Yama, Matarishvan.

Rig Veda 8/58/2:~ Only One is the Fire, enkindled in numerous ways; only One is the Sun, pervading this whole universe; only One is the Dawn, illuminating all things. In very truth, the One has become the whole world.

The Gods and Goddesses important to the Hindus of today are Ram, Krishna, Kali, Ganesh, Hanuman, Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva, and the respective consorts of the last three, namely, Saraswati, Lakshmi, and Shakti. None of these deities figured prominently in the Vedic pantheon, and some of them are clearly non-Vedic. The major Gods of Hinduism, like Vishnu and Shiva, are non-Aryan in origin. Though they may have belonged to the Vedic tradition, they played no major role in the Vedas.

Thus, it is important to bifurcate Hinduism from the Ancient Vedic Religion or Santana Dharma, the importance of ‘going back’ to the Vedas, to realize the Vedic religion has nothing to do with Hinduism, which is based on the diverse belief in non-Vedic Gods, dogmas, ritual, and worship of human beings, which is barred by the Vedas.

Indian people are sentimentally attached to religion because they have inherited an adulterated version of Vedism, and they call it Hinduism. Hinduism was founded by different founders of sects and castes from time to time.

Thus, understanding Hinduism is very much necessary to realize the ancient Vedic Religion or Santana Dharma, which existed prior to Buddhism, and Jainism had nothing to do with the present Hinduism. Vedic Religion or Santana Dharma was caste free, temple-free, priest-free, free of dogmas. :~ Santthosh Kumaar

Religion and caste system are the cause of concern to humanity.+

Religion and the caste system are causes of concern to humanity. The wars and violence and terrorism are going on in the name of God and religion.
Unless religion is discarded, wars and violence, terrorism, humanity will suffer.
Unless and until all the governments of the world give up the manufacturing of weapons of mass destruction and educate people about the falsity of their religion and the idea of a religious God, it is impossible to stop the wars and violence, terrorism going on in the name of God.
Democracy has to be secular. Secular means free from religious interference in administration. Religious laws and religious sentiments were kept away from the democratic setup.
Religion has to be replaced by spirituality. The Advaitic wisdom of Sage Sankara is pure Spirituality.
Advaitic wisdom of Sage Sankara has nothing to do with any religion or caste or sect because it is universal.
Sage Sankara’s Advaitic wisdom will one day replace all the religions of the world because Advaitic wisdom is the knowledge of God in truth.
Sage Sankara’s Advaitic wisdom brings universal brotherhood and unity in diversity.
Until Sage Sankara’s Advaitic wisdom is propagated effectively, many generations will suffer violence, wars, and terrorism, which is going on in the name of religion and God.
,
Sage Sankara’s Advaitic wisdom is the power that can lead to universal peace and brotherhood.
It is time for the reform to build a strong society free from dogmas and superstitions. It is high time to realize the truth that their own inherited religion is full of adulteration, and they are simply indulging in worship and activities barred by the Vedas. The Vedas warn not to indulge in non-Vedic activities.
The caste system, which is so integral to Hinduism, was also not practiced in the Vedic era. There is hardly any evidence of a rigid caste system in the Vedas. The Vedas, however, speak of various classes of people, which appear to have been names of professions, and they were not hereditary.
The Lingayat sect is seeking a separate minority religion because they do not belong to Hinduism. Lingayat thinks it was wrong to classify Lingayats as Hindus because their founder rejected the Varnashrama dharma, the Agama Shastras, Vedas, and Upanishads, so they are not a part of the Lingayat sect.
The onus is on Ligayath to prove that all other castes other than Lingayats belong to the Vedic ideology. All the castes founded by the founders of the castes are indulging in worshipping non-Vedic gods and non-Vedic rituals barred by the Vedas.
Since all the castes of India, along with Lingayat, are entitled to get minority status because all the Hindu castes have nothing to do with Vedas and Vedic Religion or Sanatana Dharma and Vedic culture.
It is argued that the purushasukta hymn of the Rig Veda (X.90), which is often referred to as giving a religious sanction to the caste system, was a later interpolation.
Rigveda prohibits: ~ “The very concept of castes by birth, upper/lower castes, superior/inferior castes, outcastes, untouchables, Dalits,
Bhagavata clearly says in 7.11.35 that: ~ “Just because one is born to a Brahmin doesn’t automatically make him a Brahmin. But he has more chances of becoming a Brahmin by acquiring Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana. Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana is the only qualification of a Brahmin to become a Brahmin. If a person born to a non-Brahmin who acquires Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana possesses he/she should be immediately accepted as a Brahmin.”
In the Vedic era, a Brahmin was a person who had acquired Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana Atma Gnana. This was an extremely difficult path of the discipline of body, mind, and intellect, and people, irrespective of their birth or class, who dedicated themselves to such an austere life, were recognized as Brahmins.
A great example of this tradition (that a person becoming a Brahmin, rather than being born as one) is the case of Vishwamitra, a warrior (Kshatriya), who became a Brahmin after attaining Atma Jnana or Self-Knowledge.
A Smritis or code of conduct composed by sage Atri defines Brahminhood very clearly.
"By birth, every man is a Shudra (an ignorant person). Through various types of disciplines (samskaras), he becomes a dwija (twice-born). Through the studies of scriptures, he becomes a vipra (or a scholar). Through the realization of the supreme spirit (Brahmajnana), he becomes a Brahmin.”
The belief that people born in the Brahmin caste automatically become Brahmins is a much later concept in very ancient India. Thus, Brahmin means not a caste but one who has attained Atma Jnana or Brahma Jnana.
By birth, everyone is Shudra. Only with Self-knowledge, or Brahma Gnana or Brahma Gnana, it is possible for every Shudra to become a Brahmin. Those who identify themselves as the Brahmin caste without Brahmajnana are not Brahmins.
Religion and caste, and creed have nothing to do with God. Humanity itself is a religion. Love and peace and equanimity are much necessary to discard the religion and sect that breeds hatred, violence in the name of God and religion.
Santana Dharma deserves to be treated on its own as a distinct religion with its own sacred texts and practices, without interlinking it with Hinduism.
It is for the Prime Minister of India and the Indian Judiciary to recognize that all the castes that come under Hinduism are entitled to get minority status because all the castes of Hinduism indulge in believing, worshipping non-Vedic Gods and non-Vedic rituals, and having their own code of conduct. The Vedas and Sanatana Dharma have nothing to do with the present caste-infected Hinduism.
The word Hindu holds all the castes together. By removing the Hindu tag from castes, all the present minority religions become the majority, and all the Hindus belonging to the castes become a minority. : ~Santthosh Kuaar

The term Hinduism came into existence in British rule.+


A great majority of Hindus are not in contact with their religious history; therefore, they believe their inherited beliefs as the ultimate truth.
In Encyclopaedia Britannica, it says: - The word Hinduism was first used by the British writers in the year 1830 to describe the multiplicity of the faiths of the people of India, excluding the converted Christians. (Volume- -20, Reference -581)
That is the reason today, the majority of scholars say that the word Hinduism is a misnomer.
The correct word should be Santana Dharma, the eternal religion, or the Vedic Dharma, the religion of the Vedas.
Swami Vivekananda says: - The word Hindu is a misnomer; the correct word should be a Vedantin, a person who follows the Vedas.

Hinduism is not a Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma. Hindus do idol worship, while the Vedas bar idol worship. Hinduism is not Santana Dharma or the Vedic religion. Hinduism is not a religion. Rather, it is a group of religions found within India that share common beliefs while still remaining very different.

The ancient peoples of India belong to the Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma; therefore, they have nothing to do with present-day Hinduism.

The ancient peoples of the Indus Valley of undivided India were called Hindus by Muslim invaders.
Hindu idols or deities or the temples have nothing to do with the Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma. Vedic people ate beef. The Hindu practices of idol worship, temple worship, and the ban on beef-eating were introduced many centuries later.
As one peeps into the annals of religious history, he finds that Hinduism, which exists today, is not a continuation of the Vedic religion, and it has no real historical foundation. Hinduism is of a much later origin.
As per the researchers, the two faiths, the Hindu belief system, have drifted miles away from the Vedic faith so that the two seem to be two distinct faiths. It is not difficult to discover that there is no noticeable continuity of Hinduism from the Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma.
The distinctive characteristics of the Hindu belief system cannot be traced in the Vedic literature. Besides, although the Vedas are revered as sacred texts, there are many people in India who do not know what ‘belief in the Vedas’ means. In most cases, the acquaintance of the Hindus with the Vedas is limited to the few hymns that are recited in temples and household liturgies.
Max Müller says ~ “The religion of the Veda knows no idols; the worship of idols in India is a secondary formation, a degradation of the more primitive worship of ideal Gods.
Remember:~
Hinduism is not a religion but more a way of life. The term "Hinduism" is used to label the entire Indian people.
Hinduism indulges in non-Vedic beliefs such as idolatry, ancestor worship, pilgrimages, priest craft, offerings made in temples, the caste system, untouchability, and child marriages. All these lack Vedic sanctions; therefore, Hinduism is not the Ancient Vedic religion or Santana Dharma.
All Hindus indulge in non-Vedic practices barred by the Vedas, introduced by the different founders of the different sects of Hinduism at different times, whereas the Vedic religion, or Santana Dharma, is ancient and has no founder.
Hinduism is not Santana Dharma or the Vedic religion. Hinduism is not a religion. Rather, it is a group of religions found within India that share common beliefs while still remaining very different.
The ancient peoples of India belong to the Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma; therefore, they have nothing to do with present-day Hinduism. The ancient peoples of the Indus Valley of Undivided India were called Hindus by Muslim invaders.
Hindu idols or deities or the temples have nothing to do with the Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma. Vedic people ate beef. The Hindu practices of idol worship, temple worship, and the ban on beef-eating were introduced many centuries later.
As one peeps into the annals of religious history, he finds that Hinduism, which exists today, is not a continuation of the Vedic religion, and it has no real historical foundation. Hinduism is of a much later origin.
As per the researchers, the two faiths, the Hindu belief system, have drifted miles away from the Vedic faith so that the two seem to be two distinct faiths. It is not difficult to discover that there is no noticeable continuity of Hinduism from the Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma.
The distinctive characteristics of the Hindu belief system cannot be traced in the Vedic literature. Besides, although the Vedas are revered as sacred texts, there are many people in India who do not know what ‘belief in the Vedas’ means. In most cases, the acquaintance of the Hindus with the Vedas is limited to the few hymns that are recited in temples and household liturgies.

As we peep into the annals of religious History, we find:~

After naming the discriminating principle of casteism of Manu Dharma as Hinduism, the religions of Saivism and Vaishnavism, which were enslaved to the caste discriminating principles, were given a new name as ‘Hinduism’! Thus, the Hindu religion is different from the Santana Dharma or the Vedic religion.

The term Hinduism came into existence during British rule. Hinduism is the caste discriminating principle of Varnashrama Dharma based on the Book of Manu.

After 1750 A.D., Europeans captured certain parts of India and started ruling those areas. The capital of the then British India was Calcutta, the present-day Kolkata.

The Britishers were duty-bound to administer justice to the people living within their dominion. Thus, they set up courts of justice. They needed laws to administer justice through the courts.

To administer justice to the Christian citizens of India living within their dominion, there was Christian Law, based on Biblical principles.

To administer justice to the Muslim citizens of India living within their dominion, there was Islamic Law, based on Quranic principles. But to administer justice to non-Christian and non-Islamic citizens living in British dominion, there was no law book. This created problems for the Britishers.

At this time, Sir William Jones was appointed as the chief justice of the Supreme Court at Calcutta. Local pundits made Sir William Jones believe that the book of Manu was the law book for the people of India.

Sir William Jones believed pundits and translated the book of Manu from Sanskrit to English. Thus, based on the laws of Manu, a law was formed for administering justice to non-Christian and non-Muslim Indians of the British dominion, and this law was called the Hindu law.

The principles of the book of Manu, which was used for drafting the Hindu Law, are called Hinduism. The basic principle of the book of Manu is caste discrimination.

The name coined by Sir William Jones to denote caste discriminating principles is Hinduism. It is not a religion. It is a way of Life. It is the way of life of the Indus people.

In this, a historic false perception crept in. That is when they called the terms Christian Law, Muslim Law, and Hindu Law; both Christian Law and Muslim Law were associated with the Christian religion and the Islamic religion. But in respect of Hindu Law, a false perception of religion was wrongly attributed to it as if it was also associated with a ‘Hindu religion’ which was not there.

This false perception developed a false notion that non-Christian and non-Muslim Indians of the British dominion belonged to the Hindu religion.

Out of the five Indian religions, since Saivism and Vaishnavism were already enslaved to Varnashrama dharma, i.e., caste discrimination or Hindu ideology, the people of India began to use the newly originated common name of ‘Hindu religion’ to denote Saivism and Vaishnavism. The context and substance of the term Hinduism or ‘Hindu ideology ', coined by Sir William Jones, is different from the context and substance of the term ‘Hindu religion’, which was substituted erroneously and used by the people to denote Saivism and Vaishnavism.

The Orthodoxy believes in Varnashrama Dharma or caste discrimination. 

People of India wrongly believe that Hinduism is an ancient religion because they are unaware of the fact that Hinduism is not the Santana Dharma or Vedic religion.

People of India have to liberate themselves from the stranglehold of casteism to realize their original religion is not Hinduism, which is full of different castes and creeds, but the Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma. The people should be educated about the historical truth of the Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma.:~ Santthosh Kumaar

There is hardly any evidence of a rigid caste system in the Vedas.+

Upon close examination, we discover that the religion of the Vedas was not the religion of the Hindus, nor were the Vedic people Hindus, nor will the Hindus of today approve the replacement of the term ‘Hinduism’ with ‘Vedic Religion’.
One can say exactly when the Aryans became Hindus because neither the name Hindu nor its major beliefs and practices existed in the Vedic times.
To this, one must add the marginal place the Vedic gods occupy in today’s Hindu pantheon. Also, as we have seen, the Vedas themselves are not attractive to most of today’s Hindus as sacred texts. The Ramayana, Mahabharata, Bhagavad-Gita, Puranas, and Manusmriti may have more to do with the Hinduism of today than the Vedas.
Thus, it is clear that there is no direct ancestry of modern Hinduism traceable in the Vedas, though it does have some influence on it. “The Vedic corpus reflects the archetypal religion of those who called themselves Aryans, and which, although it contributed to facets of latter-day Hinduism, was nevertheless distinct”.
The caste system, which is so integral to Hinduism, was also not practiced in the Vedic times. There is hardly any evidence of a rigid caste system in the Vedas. It is argued that the purushasukta hymn of the Rig Veda (X.90), which is often referred to to give a religious sanction to the caste system, was a later interpolation.
The Vedas, however, speak of various classes of people, which appear to have been names of professions, and they were not hereditary.
“The very concept of castes by birth, upper/lower castes, superior/inferior castes, outcastes, untouchables, Dalits, etc., is clearly prohibited by the Rigveda”.
Rigveda prohibits: ~ “The very concept of castes by birth”.
There is hardly any evidence of a rigid caste system in the Vedas. It is argued that the purushasuktahymn of the Rig Veda (X.90), which is often referred to to give a religious sanction to the caste system, was a later interpolation.
The Vedas, however, speak of various classes of people, which appear to have been names of professions, and they were not hereditary.
The very concepts of castes by birth, upper/lower castes, superior/inferior castes, outcastes, untouchables, Dalits, etc., are clearly prohibited by the Rig-Veda.
The caste system, which is so integral to Hinduism, was also not practiced in the Vedic times.
The Book of Manu was made by Manu Dharma Shastra. The Book of Manu was a book that originated in India in and around the 9th century A.D. This book of Manu was given a false spiritual interpretation by orthodoxy. And this book was projected as ‘Manu Dharma Shastra’ by orthodoxy. It is the Manu Dharma Shastra that is the foundation and cause for caste discrimination.
The orthodoxy that has taken upon the responsibility to maintain, propagate, and perpetuate the authority of caste discriminating principle called Manu Dharma Shastra.
This caste discrimination led to umpteen numbers of castes and sub-castes within the Indian population. Today, because of this, caste discrimination makes the Hindus hate each other, fight each other; therefore, there is no unity among the Hindus.
This caste discriminating tool is used by modern-day politicians to divide and destroy the social fabric of India. The politicians and the orthodox cults preserve and promote Varnashrama Dharma for their own advantage, which is non-Vedic. Orthodox cults and politicians glorify, preserve, enforce, and perpetuate caste discrimination in India.
Remember this:~
Hinduism of today is of a much later origin, and a historical view of Indian religions would endorse a dichotomy between Vedic Religion or Sanatana Dharma and contemporary Hinduism.
Hinduism does not have a long ancestry as is often presumed or propagated by the Hindu ideologues. Historically, religions like Buddhism and Jainism can claim greater antiquity than the Hinduism of today.
Hinduism began to take a systematic form from the time of the South Indian Sage Sankara in the 8th century A.D. In this sense, he may be considered the ‘founder’ of Hinduism, but it was not called Hinduism then.
People in India think Hinduism is a religion, and Santana Dharma is Hinduism. But it is not so. - Hinduism has drifted miles away from the Vedic faith so that the two seem to be two distinct faiths
Vedic Religion or Suntan Dharma deserves to be treated on its own as a distinct religion with its sacred texts, rites, rules of social life, beliefs, and practices, without interlinking it with Hinduism.
Perhaps it is right to maintain that the Mimamsa School, which is concerned with the investigation of the Vedic texts, their correct interpretation, and the meticulous performance of the Vedic rituals and ceremonies, has preserved and defended a part of the heritage of the Vedic tradition.
The Vedanta school may also have received a part of its inspiration from the Vedas. For the rest of the Hindu philosophical schools and religious sects, the influence of the Vedas is nominal.
As one goes into the annals of religious history, he finds:-
When we carefully examine the two faiths, it is not difficult to discover that there is no noticeable continuity of Hinduism from the Vedic religion or the Santana Dharma. Hinduism of today cannot be traced in the Vedic literature.
Although the Vedas are revered as sacred texts, many people in India do not know what ‘belief in the Vedas’ means. In most cases, the acquaintance of the Hindus with the Vedas is limited to the few hymns that are recited in temples and household liturgies.
The Vedas, as a body of scripture, contain many contradictions, and they are fragmentary. For Hindus, scriptures like the Bhagavad Gita, Ramayana, Mahabharata, and Puranas are more attractive and appealing than the Vedas.
The Gods and Goddesses they worship differ considerably from the Vedic ones. The collection of hymns called the Vedas, written in praise of certain deities by poets over several centuries, does not seem to have much significance for the Hindus of today.
Hinduism is based on mythology or the Puranas. All the Gods of Hinduism are Puranic Gods with form and attributes.
Vedic Gods like Indra, Varuna, Agni, Soma, and the like, whom the Vedic people worshipped, hardly have any significance in present-day Hinduism. The Gods and Goddesses important to the Hindus of today are Ram, Krishna, Kali, Ganesh, Hanuman, Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva, and the respective consorts of the last three, namely, Saraswati, Lakshmi, and Shakti. None of these deities figured prominently in the Vedic pantheon, and some of them are non-Vedic.
The major Gods of Hinduism, like Vishnu and Shiva, are non-Aryan in origin. Though they may have belonged to the Vedic tradition, they played no major role in the Vedas.
The more important religious sects of Hinduism, like Vaishnavism, Saivism, and so on, did not have a Vedic origin but had come into existence in comparatively recent times.
The Vedic people worshippers did not use temples and idols as Hindus of today do. For them, the sacrificial rituals were more important than temple or idol worship. The major Hindu feasts of today are based on the epic feats of Rama and Krishna and the Puranic lore on Shiva and the Goddess.
Belief in reincarnation, which is central to Hinduism of today, is not attested to in the Vedas, though they hint at life after death. The doctrine of transmigration, as elaborated in Hinduism, has no place in the Vedic hymns. In the early Vedic literature, there is no express mention of the doctrine of transmigration. It is in the Upanishads that it appears for the first time.
The Rig Veda speaks of two paths for the souls of the deceased, namely, the path of the Gods (devayana) and the path of the fathers (pitriyana). Those who go by the former enjoy immortality, and there is no return to physical life after that. The Vedic man longed for this state of life. Whereas those who go by the latter path unite with the fathers and then return to earth after having enjoyed the fruits of their deeds. Raja further states that in the entire Rig Veda ― consisting of about 10,500 verses ~ there is only one occasion where there is mention of a return to this world after death. What is implied here is that it cannot be taken as an important teaching of the Rig Veda.
The theory of Avatar (‘descend’) of Gods, which is very important to modern Hinduism, is non-Vedic.
“Significantly, the term Avatar […] is not found in the earlier Vedic texts, and is absent from the older Sanskrit glossaries”. The caste system, which is so integral to Hinduism, was also not practiced in the Vedic times. There is hardly any evidence of a rigid caste system in the Vedas. It is argued that the purushasukta hymn of the Rig Veda (X.90), which is often referred to as giving a religious sanction to the caste system, was a later interpolation. The Vedas, however, speak of various classes of people, which appear to have been names of professions, and they were not hereditary.
The very concept of castes by birth, upper/lower castes, superior/inferior castes, outcastes, untouchables, Dalits, etc., is prohibited by the Rigveda.
Vedic Religion deserves to be treated on its own as a distinct religion with its sacred texts, rites, rules of social life, beliefs, and practices, without interlinking it with modern Hinduism. Perhaps it is right to maintain that the Mimamsa school, which is concerned with the investigation of the Vedic texts, their correct interpretation, and the meticulous performance of the Vedic rituals and ceremonies, has preserved and defended a part of the heritage of the Vedic tradition. The Vedanta school may also have received a part of its inspiration from the Vedas. For the rest of the Hindu philosophical schools and religious sects, the influence of the Vedas is nominal.
Maharishi Dayananda Saraswati, the founder of Arya Samaj, was the first modern Indian thinker to emphasize the importance of ‘going back to the Vedas’ to bring about social reforms in Hindu society and to purify Hinduism of its many aberrations. The founder of Arya Samaj was the first modern Indian thinker to emphasize the importance of ‘going back to the Vedas’ to bring about social reforms in Hindu society and to purify Hinduism of its many aberrations. :~ Santthosh Kumaar

Sage Sankara said: ~Liberation comes only through the realization that Atman and Brahman are one in no other way.+

The Self is not you, but the Self is the invisible Soul, which is hidden by the illusory form, time, and space. If the Self is the invisible...